Rick Rossignol

CA Employment Law Changes for 2013

Here are some of the new key employment laws that employers will see starting in January 2013 (unless another effective date is indicated below):

 

Commission Pay Agreements — AB 1396 Any employers (based in or outside of California) with California-based employees who are paid on a commission-basis must have a written agreement with those employees that states how the commissions are calculated and paid. The term “commission” does not include a bonus- or profit-sharing plans unless the employer offers the employee a fixed percentage of sales or profits as compensation for work to be performed.

 

Wage Statement Violation Penalties — SB 1255 California Labor Code Section 226 requires employers to provide their employees with wage statements that contain nine categories of specific information. Until now, the employer did not have monetary liability under Section 226 unless the employee showed some sort of injury. Now, the new law gives Section 226 some teeth. The employee will be considered to have suffered an injury if the employer fails to provide a wage statement if the employer provides inaccurate or incomplete information on the wage statement, and the employee cannot “promptly and easily determine from the wage statement alone” any of the following:

 

  1. The amount of gross or net wages paid during the pay period, total hours worked, number of piece-rate units and applicable piece rate if the employee is paid on a piece-rate basis, all deductions, inclusive dates for the pay period, and all applicable hourly rates in effect during the pay period and the corresponding number of hours worked at each hourly rate.
  2. What deductions were made from gross wages to determine net wages.
  3. The employer’s name and address.
  4. The employee’s name and last four digits of the employee’s social security number.

 

The penalties remain the same — the greater of all actual damages or $50 for the initial pay period, and $100 for each violation in a subsequent pay period, up to a $4,000 maximum.

 

Wage Statement & Personnel Records Copies — AB 2674 This new law will amend California Labor Code Sections 226 and 1198.5. First, under Section 226, it will now require employers to maintain either a copy of the actual employee wage statement or a computer-generated record that accurately shows all of the information required to be on the wage statement. If employers are presently not keeping copies of the actual employee wage statements, or computer records of those statements, that accurately reflect all nine categories of information required under California Labor Code Section 226, they will need to start doing so.

 

Second, this new law expands employee rights and employer obligations regarding the inspection of personnel records. Presently, under California Labor Code Section 1198.5, employees have the right to inspect certain personnel records under certain conditions. AB 2674 now:

  1. Clarifies that the inspection rights apply to current and former employees.
  2. It allows the employee to obtain a copy of the personnel records in addition to inspecting them.
  3. Allows employee representatives (e.g. attorneys) to make copy or inspection requests on behalf of current or former employees unless there is an existing lawsuit.
  4. And requires compliance with an inspection or copy request within 30 days (unless mutually extended to 35 days).

 

Notice and Wage Statement Requirements for Temporary Services Employers — AB 1744 (Effective July 1, 2013)

Starting July 1, 2013, under California Labor Code Section 226, temporary services employers will now be required to provide itemized wage statements that include the rate of pay and the total hours worked for each assignment. California Labor Code Section 2810.5 (Wage Theft Protection Act) presently requires an employer to provide each employee, at the time of hiring, with a notice that includes certain information, such as the employee’s wage rate and basis, whether hourly, salary, commission, or otherwise, and to notify each employee in writing of any changes to the information in the notice within seven calendar days of the changes unless the applicable changes are reflected on a timely wage statement or another writing. AB 1744 will additionally require a temporary services employer to provide in the notice the name and physical address of the main office, the mailing address if different from the physical address of the main office, and the telephone number of the legal entity for which the employee will perform work, and any other information the Labor Commissioner deems material and necessary.

 

Nonexempt Employee Salaries — AB 2103 Generally, under California law, there is an eight-hour workday and 40-hour work week, and any hours worked in excess of eight in a day or 40 in a week requires the payment of applicable overtime compensation to nonexempt employees. And, generally, for purposes of computing the overtime rate to be paid to a nonexempt full-time salaried employee, the employee’s regular hourly rate is normally 1/40th of the employee’s weekly salary. This bill would provide that payment of a fixed salary to a nonexempt employee will be deemed to provide compensation only for the employee’s regular, nonovertime hours, even if there is a private agreement between the employer and employee to the contrary.

 

Employee Social Media Privacy — AB 1844 This law will prohibit employers from requiring or requesting an employee or applicant for employment to disclose a username or password for the purpose of accessing personal social media, to access personal social media in the presence of the employer, or to divulge any personal social media. This law will also prohibit an employer from discharging, disciplining, threatening to discharge or discipline, or otherwise retaliating against an employee or applicant for not complying with a request or demand by the employer that violates this law.

The term “social media” is broadly defined to include any “electronic service or account, or electronic content, including, but not limited to, videos, still photographs, blogs, video blogs, podcasts, instant and text messages, email, online services or accounts, or Internet Web site profiles or locations.” However, employers will be allowed to ask employees to divulge their personal social media for the purpose of an investigation into alleged employee misconduct or violations of law provided that the social media is used solely for purposes of that investigation or a related proceeding.

This new California law is not surprising in the recent wake of the National Labor Relations Board‘s recent guidance and opinions on employer social media policies.

 

Religious Dress/Grooming Accommodation — AB 1964 The new law protects religious dress practice and religious grooming practice. It specifies that the accommodation of an individual’s religious dress practice or religious grooming practice that would require that person to be segregated from the public or other employees is not a reasonable accommodation. However, no accommodation is required if an accommodation would result in the violation of specified laws protecting civil rights. The new law does not affect the employer’s obligation to provide reasonable accommodation absent undue hardship.

“Religious dress practice” will be construed broadly to include the wearing or carrying of religious clothing, head or face coverings, jewelry, artifacts, and any other item that is part of the observance by an individual of his or her religious creed. “Religious grooming practice” also will be construed broadly to include all forms of head, facial, and body hair that are part of the observance by an individual of his or her religious creed.

 

Definition of “Sex” Expanded to Protect Breastfeeding — AB 2386 Under the existing California Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA), which protects against discrimination and harassment, the term “sex” includes gender, pregnancy, childbirth, and medical conditions related to pregnancy or childbirth. The new law expands the definition of “sex” to include breastfeeding and medical conditions relating to breastfeeding.

Human Trafficking Posting — SB 1193 (Effective April 1, 2013)

No later than April 1, 2013, certain business is required to post an 8.5″ x 11″ notice (in 16-point font) in a conspicuous place near the entrance (or in other places where these types of notices are normally posted) that contains information about organizations that provide services to eliminate slavery and human trafficking. The identified business required to comply with the new law, include (1) On-sale general public premises licensees under the Alcoholic Beverage Control Act (Division 9 (commencing with Section 23000) of the Business and Professions Code); (2) Adult or sexually oriented businesses, as defined in subdivision (a) of Section 318.5 of the Penal Code; (3) Primary airports, as defined in Section 47102(16) of Title 49 of the United States Code; (4) Intercity passenger rail or light rail stations; (5) Bus stations; (6) Truck stops (“truck stop” means a privately owned and operated facility that provides food, fuel, shower or other sanitary facilities, and lawful overnight truck parking); (7) Emergency rooms within general acute care hospitals; (8) Urgent care centers; (9) Farm labor contractors, as defined in subdivision (b) of Section 1682 of the Labor Code; (10) Privately operated job recruitment centers; (11) Roadside rest areas; and (12) Businesses or establishments that offer massage or bodywork services for compensation and are not described in paragraph (1) of subdivision (b) of Section 4612 of the Business and Professions Code.

Employer Practices 2013

2013 is going to be another year of challenges for employers. Employer’s practices are under attack by the Department of Labor and NLRB.  The DOL has organized a misclassification task-force to actively address misclassification of independent contractors, and non-exempt employees misclassified as exempt. In addition, employers are also under attack by the NLRB. The NLRB has weighed in on social media policies, mandatory arbitration, the confidentiality of HR investigations, and at-will waivers and handbooks.

Employers need to be proactive and develop their Human Resources infrastructures that are not the only compliant but allow them to focus on retention.

CA Employers have to brush off their policies and procedures!

We have some changes in employment law for 2013. I have put together the highlights of the changes. Employers are going to need to update their policies and procedures.

 

Wage and Hour: Compensation AgreementsCalifornia law generally requires the payment of overtime to nonexempt employees for hours worked over 8 in a day, 40 in a workweek, and on the seventh consecutive day of work. This calculation is simple for nonexempt employees paid an hourly wage, but not for nonexempt employees paid a fixed salary. Existing law, therefore, specifies, for purposes of computing the overtime rate of compensation, that a nonexempt full-time salaried employee’s regular “hourly” rate of pay is 1/40th of the employee’s weekly salary.

Effective January 1, 2013, payment of a fixed salary to a nonexempt employee includes compensation only for the employee’s regular, non-overtime hours. The legislation effectively invalidates any private agreement to the contrary. In other words, parties who enter into “explicit mutual wage agreements” may only, through those agreements, provide for regular compensation, not overtime compensation. The stated intent of this legislation is to overturn Arechiga v. Dolores Press (2011) 192 Cal.App.4th 567, in which the Court of Appeal held an “explicit mutual wage agreement”, between an employer and employee that provided a fixed salary for 66 hours of work each week, complied with California overtime laws and that no further overtime compensation was owed to the employee.

 

Itemized Wage Statements and Wage Theft Notice:  (A) the employer fails to provide a wage statement, or (B)fails to provide accurate and complete information and the employee cannot promptly without reference to other documents or information determine the following from the wage statement alone: (1) gross or net wages paid during the pay period, (2) total hours worked, PayStub(3) piece-rate units earned and rate, (4) deductions, (5) pay period, (6) hourly rates and corresponding hours worked at each rates, (7) the employer’s name and address, (8) the employee’s name, and (9) the employee’s last 4 digits (only) of his or her social security number or employee identification number.  http://www.dir.ca.gov/dlse/PayStub.pdf   A “knowing and intentional failure” will not include an isolated and unintentional payroll error due to a clerical or inadvertent mistake. The fact finder is authorized to consider, in reviewing for compliance with these provisions, whether the employer, prior to an alleged violation, has adopted and is in compliance with a set of policies, procedures, and practices that fully comply with section 226. This legislation clarifies that an itemized wage statement “copy”, for purposes of Labor Code section 226’s requirement that an employer to keep a copy of the statement on file for at least 3 years at the place of employment or at a central location within the State of California, can include a computer-generated record rather than an actual duplicate copy. Beginning July 1, 2013, in addition to existing requirements of Labor Code section 226 for itemized wage statements, the itemized statement temporary services employers issue will be required to include the rate of pay and the total hours worked for each temporary service assignment.

 

Personnel Records: Inspection Procedures, Time, and Penalties: The employer will be required to make the personnel records available for inspection, or provide a copy if the employee so requests, to the current or former employee or employee’s representative within 30 calendar days of the employer’s receipt of the employee’s written request. The employee and employer may agree in writing to a date longer than 30 days, but not to exceed 35 days, from the employer’s receipt of the employee’s request. The bill requires the employee to make the request to inspect or copy in writing but provides that it may be on an employer-provided form and that the employer may designate the person to whom a request must be made. The employer may redact the name of any non-supervisory employee contained in the personnel records prior to inspection or copying.

Q. A

For current employees, the employer must make the records available for inspection or provide a copy at the place where the employee reports to work or another mutually-agreeable location. For former employees, the employer must make the records available for inspection or provide a copy at the location where the employer stores the records unless a different location is mutually agreed upon in writing. The employee may receive a copy by mail if he or she reimburses the employer for postal expenses. For an employee who was terminated for a violation of law or an employment-related policy, involving harassment or workplace violence, the employer may make the records available at a location a reasonable driving distance from the former employee’s residence or mail the records to the employee.

 

Social Media: Employer Use:
Effective January 1, 2013, employers will be prohibited from requiring or requesting an employee or applicant for employment to: (1) disclose a user name or account password to access a personal social media account, (2) access personal social media in the employer’s presence, or (3) divulge any personal social media. This legislation does not affect an employer’s ability to request that an employee divulge personal social media reasonably believed to be relevant to an investigation of allegations of employee misconduct or employee violation of applicable laws and regulations, as long as the social media is used solely for that or a related investigation or proceeding. This legislation applies purely to personal social media. It does not restrict an employer from requesting or requiring an employee to disclose a username, password, or other method of accessing an employer-issued electronic device.

 

Written Commission Agreements:
Effective of January 1, 2013, an employer who enters into an employment contract with an employee involving commissions as a method of payment will be required to put the employment contract in writing and set forth the method by which the commissions will be computed and paid. In other words, in practice, this bill requires that commission agreements (1) be in writing; (2) set forth the method by which the commissions are required to be computed and paid; and (3) contain a signed receipt for the contract from each employee. This new requirement was the result of AB 1396, which the Governor signed into law in 2011. AB 2675 (2012) exempts from this requirement temporary, variable incentive payments that increase, but do not decrease, payment under the written contract

 

Human Trafficking: Public Posting RequirementsThe notice must be placed in a conspicuous location near the entrance or otherwise easily visible by the public and employees, and be printed notice in English, Spanish, and in one other language that is the most widely spoken language in the county where the establishment is located and for which translation is mandated by the federal Voting Rights Act. The notice must provide information about and contact information for specified nonprofit organizations that provide services in support of the elimination of slavery and human trafficking. Even though the statute specifies the notice’s specific content, font, and size, it also requires the Department of Justice to, on or before April 1, 2013, develops a model notice and make it available for download on the department’s Internet Web site.

 

Access to Social Media for Employers denied!

California Gov. Jerry Brown signed two bills into law on Thursday that keep employers or universities from demanding access passwords to Facebook or Twitter accounts.

AB 1844, Campos. Employer use of social media.
Existing law generally regulates the conduct of employers in the state.
This bill would prohibit an employer from requiring or requesting an employee or applicant for employment to disclose a username or password for the purpose of accessing personal social media, to access personal social media in the presence of the employer, or to divulge any personal social media. This bill would also prohibit an employer from discharging, disciplining, threatening to discharge or discipline, or otherwise retaliating against an employee or applicant for not complying with a request or demand by the employer that violates these provisions.
Under existing law, the Labor Commissioner, who is the Chief of the Division of Labor Standards Enforcement in the Department of Industrial Relations, is required to establish and maintain a field enforcement unit to investigate specified violations of the Labor Code and other labor laws and to enforce minimum labor standards. Existing law authorizes, and under specified circumstances requires, the Labor Commissioner to investigate employee complaints of violations of the Labor Code, provide for a hearing, and determine all matters arising under his or her jurisdiction.
This bill would provide that the Labor Commissioner is not required to investigate or determine any violation of a provision of this bill.

 

 

Does HR deserve a seat at the executive table?

I read this article on whether Human Resources deserves a seat at the table? In most cases, I have a problem with the assumption that anyone deserves the CEO’s ear. I believe that it has to be earned. If you are not adding value there is no reason for you to be at the table. No one deserves a seat at the table! You earn a seat at the table. You get to the table by delivering results! http://bit.ly/UUUjCw

Labor Department Cranking up compliance pressure on joint employers

Employers wanting to outsource their employment law compliance need to understand that they can not transfer their risk to an employer of record. The Department of Labor is targeting joint employers. Read the article by John Thompson http://bit.ly/TAIulF

Employers need to understand they really can not outsource their liability to be in compliance with the Fair Labor Standard Act. They control the work and ultimately are responsible for their employment practices… and they are responsible for their co-employees practices as well.

Talent Acquisition

As more companies turn to pre-employment tests, complaints of bias are cropping up. Employers are increasingly looking for assessment tests to ensure they make the offer to the candidate that is the best fit for the company.  Will testing lead you to the perfect candidate? or to a disparate impact lawsuit?  The EEOC has developed a set of rules for employers to follow to ensure their selection process does not discriminate against any protected classes, Uniform Guidelines on Employee Selection Procedures. The employer needs to be in compliance with these guidelines or be guilty of discrimination. The guidelines are designed to ensure that the selection process doe not create an adverse impact on any group of candidates. If the overall selection process has an adverse impact, the adverse impact of the selection procedure should be analyzed. The employer needs to validate its test.  The test needs to be a validated predictor of success for the job description. Validation is the demonstration of the job-relatedness of a selection procedure. The Uniform Guidelines recognize the same three validity strategies recognized by the American Psychological Association:

  1. Criterion-related validity—a statistical demonstration of a relationship between scores on a selection procedure and job performance of a sample of workers.
  2. Content validity—a demonstration that the content of a selection procedure is representative of important aspects of performance on the job.
  3. Construct validity—a demonstration that (a) a selection procedure measures a construct (something believed to be an underlying human trait or characteristic, such as honesty ) and (b) the construct is important for successful job performance.

 

Employers need to develop a selection process that enables them to hire top talent and not discriminate.

Attraction and Retention

Business growth does not just happen! The organization has to make some strategic decisions on what type of employer it wants to be. Talent is what differentiates your business from the competition! What is your employment brand going to be? The brand is not just a story on a website, its the employee experience! Perspective employees check out the company on LinkedIn, Glassdoor, and Facebook. Employers have to walk the talk!

Marissa Mayer is hired as the CEO and her first priority is Human Resources. The first step is to change the employment brand.  She realizes that the culture has to change. The HR guy is out and they are going to build an environment that values employees. She needs them engaged if she is going to turn the company around.

You build the company by creating a culture that has values and provides an environment that rewards innovative thinking, builds pride in the company, and empowers the employees as owners. Employees want to add value and be part of the success!

What kind of employees does your organization need? Are you going after top talent? Are you hiring minimum wage? Your company strategy is going to be different depending on where you want to play in the market. Who is your competition? where do they play? You can not compete without talent! Talent gets you in the game!