Rick Rossignol

CA updates exemption for Computer software employee

California’s Department of Industrial Relations (DIR) announced rate changes for the computer software employee exemption and the licensed physician or surgeon exemption. The new rates take effect January 1, 2016.

For the computer software employees’ exemption:

  • The minimum hourly rate of pay exemption increased to $41.85 from its previous rate of  $41.27;
  • The minimum monthly salary increased to $7,265.43 from its previous rate of  $7,165.12; and
  • The minimum annual salary exemption increased to $87,185.14 from its previous rate of $85,981.40.

For the licensed physician or surgeon exemption:

  • The minimum hourly pay for licensed physicians and surgeons increased to $76.24 from $75.19.

These rates are tied to the California Consumer Price Index (CCPI) for Urban Wage Earners and Clerical Workers. The 2016 rate changes reflect the 1.4 percent increase in the CCPI.

Salary Basis Threshold Changed!

What does the change in salary test mean to employers?
The salary basis test is the weekly salary an employee must earn to be considered exempt from overtime and FSLA. If an employee does not meet the salary test they cannot be exempt and must be paid overtime. They receive a weekly salary without deductions for the quality or quantity of work performed in the workweek.
First, it raises the minimum weekly salary an employee needs to earn to be exempt from the FSLA.
1. Employers should evaluate their weekly salaries for all employees.
2. All employees earning less than $970 a week will no longer qualify to be exempt from the FLSA. An employee earning an annual salary of less than $50440. must be paid overtime.
3. Evaluate their job duties and hours to determine the correct classification of their position.
4. Develop job descriptions and have employees sign and date the job descriptions.
5. Employers should expect classification audits in 2016 and beyond!

The goal of the Department of Labor is to make 5 million more workers eligible for overtime. This a great opportunity to take a critical look at your exempt positions and ensure that they meet the salary test as well as the duties test to be classified as exempt.

After more than 15 months of waiting, the U.S. Department of Labor has issued a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (“NPRM”) announcing the Department’s intention to shrink dramatically the pool of employees who qualify for exempt status under the Fair Labor Standards Act.

Department’s intention to increase the salary basis threshold for the white-collar exemptions from $455 a week (or $23,660 a year) to $921 a week ($47,892 a year), which the Department expects to revise to $970 a week ($50,440 a year in 2016) when it issues its Final Rule. By the Department’s own estimate, under this single change to the regulations, which appears at part 541 of Title 29 of the Code of Federal Regulations, 4.6 million currently exempt employees would lose their exemption right away, with another 500,000 to 1 million currently exempt employees losing exempt status over the next 10 years as a result of the automatic increases to the salary threshold.
The NPRM acknowledges that roughly 25 percent of all employees currently exempt and subject to the salary basis requirement will be rendered non-exempt under the proposed regulations. The Department recognizes that employers are likely to reduce the working hours of currently exempt employees reclassified as a result of these regulations and that the reduction in hours will probably lead to lower overall pay for these employees. The NPRM tries to predict how much money these employees will lose, though, in the end, the Department recognizes that it is unable to do so with any precision.
Related changes in the regulations include increasing the annual compensation threshold for exempt highly compensated employees from the present level of $100,000 to a proposed $122,148, as well as raising the exemption threshold for the motion picture producing industry from the present $695 a week to a proposed $1,404 a week for employees compensated on a day-rate basis.

The truth is, everyone has a competitor.

What separates you from your competition? Your Employees! The organization has to build an infrastructure that employees want to work for! It does not happen by accident! In most cases the company treats employees like a precious resource. People are not disposable.

http://bit.ly/1H9rDMq

Salary test proposed changes!

The Department of Labor has released its long-awaited overhaul of the Exemptions from the FSLA. Currently, the white-collar exemptions in 29 CFR Part 541 require employers to pay employees a salary of at least $455 per week ($23,660 annually) and to perform certain exempt duties. The “highly-compensated” exemption currently requires employers to pay a salary of over $100,000 annually. The proposed amendments increase the salary basis test from $455/week to $970/week ($50,440 annually) beginning in 2016. Similarly, the “highly-compensated” exemption under the FLSA has been increased from $100,000 to $125,148 annually, which is tied to the 90th salary percentile.

There are two tests for an employee to be classified as exempt from the Fair Labor Standard Act, Salary, and Duties. The salary test requires the employee to be paid a minimum weekly salary regardless of the hours worked. The duties test requires the employee to perform certain duties to be considered exempt. In California, the employee has to perform exempt level duties 51% of the time.

What does it all mean for employers?
Review and update your job descriptions to ensure positions are classified correctly.
Review the salary to ensure it meets the minimum.
Review the hours worked by each position.

Can you win the war for Talent ?

The U.S. had 5.4 million job openings in April. The total was the highest since the department began conducting the so-called Jolts survey in 2000. The talent market is heating up. The pendulum swings in the candidate favor, a smaller supply of quality candidates. Employer’s must develop their strategy for attracting and retaining talent. Employers must build their employment brand and effectively communicate what they have to offer candidates and why they want to continue to work for them.

http://bit.ly/1JxD8AP

Retaliation Claims Cost Company $$$

Today, employers face increased scrutiny and have a greater chance of lawsuits and huge fines if they take any action that is viewed as retaliation against an employee or group of employees. Retaliation can include any negative job action, such as demotion, discipline, firing, salary reduction, limited scheduling, or job or shift reassignment.

One thing is certain — retaliation is illegal and it’s something that employers need to review and remedy today. The stakes can be quite high if this remains a common practice.

Independent Contractor or Employee!

The courts have considered many facts in deciding whether a worker is an independent contractor or an employee. These relevant facts fall into three main categories: behavioral control; financial control; and the relationship of the parties. In each case, it is very important to consider all the facts – no single fact provides the answer. Carefully review the following definitions. Behavioral Control These facts show whether there is a right to direct or control how the worker does the work. A worker is an employee when the business has the right to direct and control the worker. The business does not have to actually direct or control the way the work is done – as long as the employer has the right to direct and control the work. For example Instructions – if you receive extensive instructions on how work is to be done, this suggests that you are an employee. Instructions can cover a wide range of topics, for example: • how, when, or where to do the work • what tools or equipment to use • what assistants to hire to help with the work • where to purchase supplies and services If you receive less extensive instructions about what should be done, but not how it should be done, you may be an independent contractor. For instance, instructions about time and place may be less important than directions on how the work is performed. Training – if the business provides you with training about required procedures and methods, this indicates that the business wants the work done in a certain way, and this suggests that you may be an employee. Financial Control These facts show whether there is a right to direct or control the business part of the work. For example Significant Investment – if you have a significant investment in your work, you may be an independent contractor. While there is no precise dollar test, the investment must have substance. However, a significant investment is not necessary to be an independent contractor. Expenses – if you are not reimbursed for some or all business expenses, then you may be an independent contractor, especially if your unreimbursed business expenses are high. Opportunity for Profit or Loss – if you can realize a profit or incur a loss, this suggests that you are in business for yourself and that you may be an independent contractor. Relationship of the Parties These are facts that illustrate how the business and the worker perceive their relationship. For example Employee Benefits – if you receive benefits, such as insurance, pension, or paid leave, this is an indication that you may be an employee. If you do not receive benefits, however, you could be either an employee or an independent contractor. Written Contracts – a written contract may show what both you and the business intend. This may be very significant if it is difficult, if not impossible, to determine status based on other facts.

http://bit.ly/1BFzNNo